When this course started and we were introduced to the group
blog idea I was very skeptical. I’m not
a huge fan of group work and I don’t like other people being responsible for my
grades and vice versa. I also didn’t know
how we would organize our blog. I was
worried that the brunt of the work would be placed on one person. Luckily with my group that didn’t happen and
we were all really good about splitting the work evenly. We did have a few mix ups because we always
split up the work which made it difficult to remember who was responsible for
the blog that week. I also felt like it
would be difficult to write the blog because I was worried that our ideas wouldn’t
all be the same. That wasn’t the case
though because even when we didn’t see eye to eye on everything we were all
willing to listen to the others’ ideas and thoughts which allowed us to grow
and learn different ideas. Our blog
never really matched up to our manifesto simply because I don’t think we
completely understood the blog assignment when we wrote our manifesto. We planned to make it much more exciting than
it ended up being and I think part of that was our schedule. Everyone in my group had a very full schedule
this semester and I think that was part of the reason that our blog was a bit
dry. We did try to include interesting
views and ideas into our blog and I think that matched up well with our
original manifesto. We just kind of
struggled because when one of us was busy it seemed like all of us were busy. I didn’t expect so many students to have such
different interpretations of each reading.
It really gave me the opportunity to learn because it allowed me to read
others’ interpretations and compare them to mine. I am a fan of learning from different ideas
and perspectives and this blog assignment really allowed me to do so. Had I not been exposed to other blogs I might
not have ever realized the different ways that the text could be
understood. By reading other blogs I was
equipped with every weapon I could have for class discussion because I could
reference my fellow classmates’ blogs and ideas. This assignment really allowed me to grow and
learn in terms of understanding the texts that we read in this course.
RESINK
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Thursday, November 13, 2014
The Awakening & Presentation Idea
Kate Chopin’s The
Awakening was a very controversial book back during the time in which it
was written. It is easy to see this because it shows the main female character,
Edna, wanting to explore her sexual desires with other men besides her husband.
She goes off on many excursions with various men throughout the story – while deceiving
those around her, mainly her husband. In the process she starts to realize that
she doesn’t want to be a “proper lady” like madame Ratignolle, but instead was
wanting to be more like mademoiselle Reisz who was more artistic and
free-spirited. We didn’t really understand why Edna would choose to swim out
into the ocean and drown herself though. In class we talked about the Creole
vs. Anglo argument that is portrayed in this book, and because Edna was of
Creole decent we have now come to the conclusion that she most likely drowned
herself because she was “owned” by her husband. We say this because in class we
talked about some of the Creole customs and one of them was that the women are
pretty much the property of the men. So with that being said, Edna would have
been afraid to confront her husband because she had cheated on him and was
afraid of just what he would do.
Now we would like to go over what we plan to do for our
final paper/presentation. The three of us (plus Joshua Zaborowski) plan on
creating a website on the topic of 19th century heroism. We chose
this topic because although it is broad, it gives us a lot of room to work with
and will be able to compare and contrast the different styles of heroes that we
have learned about during this semester. We will be focusing mainly on Byronic and
Romantic heroes, while also comparing the modern day hero to the 19th
century hero. We have the general basis of what our presentation/paper will be
on. The main heroes (or stories) that we plan to focus on are Joaquin Murrieta,
Frankenstein, and the slave in Douglass’s Narrative
to name a few. We will discuss how each of these characters are heroes and what
purpose they serve in their respective stories, as well as the similarities and
differences amongst them. We will be getting together over the next few weeks
to iron out the rest of the details and put the information in a neat,
organized, and creative outlook on our websites – while also putting the
process of the website design into our paper and presentation. Please provide
us with some helpful output on if our idea is ideal and possibly what you might
suggest we do differently, thank you!
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Pudd'nhead Unchained
In this blog I would really like to relate Twain’s Pudd’nhead Wilson to the Quinten
Tarantino film “Django Unchained.” “Django
Unchained” is a sort of Western film only extremely modernized and, like an
Tarantino film, extremely gruesome.
Django, who is played by Jaime Foxx is a former slave who was freed by a
German bounty hunter who was disguised as a dentist going to different
plantations to conduct business. The
bounty hunter makes a deal with Django that if he can help catch the bounties
he will be a free man and he will split the profit. Django agrees under the condition that they
must free his long lost wife from slavery at the “Candy Land” plantation owned
by Calvin Candy. Stephen, who is played
by Samuel L. Jackson reminds me a lot of the Real Chambers, or “Tom.” Stephen is one of the older more privileged slaves
on Candy’s plantation. He has the right
to stay in the “big house” and when Candy is away he even tends to
business. He acts very much like a white
slave owner would even though he himself is a black slave. One scene that really demonstrates this is
the scene in which Django and the bounty hunter first ride into “Candy Land.” Django rides a horse alongside the bounty
hunter while slaves that Candy just purchased are forced to walk behind the
wagon. Upon seeing Django, a former
slave, upon a horse Stephen has an interesting reaction. He meets the group on the front steps of the “big
house” and after a little heckling he asks Candy, “Who dis nigger upon dat nag?” I find this very interesting because Stephen
is economically more poor than Django, given that Django is a free man and
Stephen is still in slavery. It really
reminds me of Real Chamber’s character in that because he is raised white and
treated better, in turn he oppresses other races and treats other people
poorly. Another parallel between the two
stories is the idea of being “sold down river” in Pudd’nhead Wilson and the fact that Stephen wants Django to be sent
to the LeQuint Dickey Mining Company. In
Pudd’nhead Wilson everybody fears
being “sold down river” because they know how harsh conditions will be. Being “sold down river” is intended to mean
that they will have to work every waking moment of every day, they will be
beaten, they will be starved, and they will be much worse off than they were
before they started causing trouble. That
is exactly what the LeQuint Dickey Mining Company is supposed to do. After Django gets caught and the white men
start to torture him, Stephen convinces them that sending him to the mining
company will be worse punishment than anything they could ever do to him
because he will be whipped constantly, he will work until the day he dies
without ever getting a break, and he might die soon because of his
defiance. Luckily, before Django gets to
the mining camp he convinces the men who are transporting him that he can help
them make a lot of money, in turn he blows those men up and returns to “Candy
Land” where he basically murders everyone that gets in his way and he saves his
wife. I just watched “Django Unchained”
this week and I found so many parallels when comparing it to Pudd’nhead Wilson that I can’t help but
wonder if the movie is at least loosely based on the novel.
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Plot Twists & Turns
Sherlock Holmes. This particular
story made me very delighted as there is finally a competent adversary to face
off against Sherlock, the woman. She consistently outwits him and stays one
step ahead of all of Sherlock’s plans. This was very much seen in the extra
credit video that we saw Tuesday night from the television/mini-series Sherlock. In the video we saw that “the
woman” managed to poison Sherlock, faked her death, and managed to throw him
through a loop when it came to trying to figure out the pass-code to her cell
phone. This is such an uncommon situation when it comes to Sherlock because he
is known for being one of the greatest – if not the greatest – deductive specialists.
He never misses anything, not even the minutest detail. So this makes it very
interesting that this random woman is able to “pull the wool” over Sherlock’s
eyes. The shows makes it clear that Sherlock and “the woman” have feelings for
one another, whether those feelings are love or just admiration for a fellow
genius is still to be seen. Nonetheless, it is quite clear to me that whatever
the feelings he had for the woman made him vulnerable to her tactics – just as
her feelings for him allowed him to beat her in the end. It truly is a riveting
story line.
Another really intriguing story we
read was Rudyard Kipling’s The Man Who
Would Be King. The story of Daniel Dravot and Peachey Carnehan going into
the foreign land of Kafiristan to make themselves kings is a dream that most
people have – I am referring to the being a king/queen, not taking over another
land. They accomplished this by making the Kafiristan locals believe that the
two of them were Gods among men. However, Daniel gets greedy and tries to take
a wife which was against the rules. The woman was frightened and ended up
biting Daniel causing him to bleed which showed the locals that the two of them
were in fact not Gods, but mere humans like themselves. The locals turned
against Daniel and Peachey, killed Daniel by making him fall to his death, and
staked Peachey with wooden stakes – that is quite the grotesque scene when
seeing the movie version. In the end, all Peachey has to remember his time as a
king is the decapitated head of his dear friend (Daniel) and the crown that was
upon his head when he fell to his death. Now if that isn’t a story that you can
really sink your teeth into, than I don’t know what is!
These two stories both kept the
three of us on the edge of our seats because they both included many plot
twists. The fact that they were able to capture our attention so vehemently really
shows how intriguing the two authors wrote their stories! This being said, we
believe that the best stories frequently have thrilling endings that nobody
sees coming (or at least, that is the idea the authors have in mind).
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Kipling and Harrison
Hubert Harrison wrote, “The Black Man’s Burden (A Reply to
Rudyard Kipling) in 1920. This poem was
written in response Rudyard Kipling’s “The White Man’s Burden.” Kipling’s work is almost a satirical piece
that concerns the hardships that white men went through in the nineteenth
century. Today when I read Kipling’s
work I have to laugh in order to avoid complete anger. The fact that Kipling tried to argue that
what he was writing about were hardships is disgusting. In fact, I think that Kipling was trying to
be comedic because I have a hard time believing that anybody could have ever
believed that what Kipling is describing was a hardship. Harrison did a great job in his reply to
Kipling though because what he described as hardships are really
hardships. Harrison talks about the lies
that the white men told the black men. He
talks about how the white men starved their slaves and still worked them day
and night in terrible conditions. Reading
Harrison’s work makes me realize the seriousness of slavery in the nineteenth
century. Harrison’s piece truly depicts
the struggles that the black men and women had to suffer through during such a
terrible time in our nation’s history. As
an aspiring teacher I think that these two pieces would be great to compare in
a history class. I think that these
pieces show exactly the differences between what white men thought of as a
burden and what was truly a burden for black men. It is important that we read and understand
pieces like these so that we can create a future in which we do not recreate
the past. I cannot imagine living in a
world where all of the men in one race were considered less human than another
race. I do believe though that racial
inequality still exists and that bothers me.
I do not understand how someone can think less of a person because of
his or her skin color. After all of the
revolution that has taken place in our country it would seem as though we would
understand equality, yet we continuously forget. Harrison did such a wonderful job of
comparing what a real burden was to what Kipling described as a burden. I think it would be important to point this
out to students so that they could see how naïve white slave owners were, how
they lacked work ethic in every sense. How
they thought controlling an entire race was a burden that they were forced to
uphold when it was a burden that they could have put an end to without much
effort at all. I really enjoy comparing
these two pieces for a number of reasons.
I am a huge fan of poetry, and Harrison and Kipling to a great job of
using poetry to portray their thoughts and feelings. Also, I think that by reading work from this
time I get a better sense of what was really happening in the nineteenth
century instead of the sugarcoated version that I got from history books in
high school.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
19th Century Amusement
In the nineteenth century sports
became largely popular in the United States. This was mainly due to the
introduction to bat-ball sports when New England started to migrate west. The
biggest of those sports was cricket, which became vastly popular within the
middle states. Americans changed around the format of this game to create the
game of baseball which was just a more organized and “sophisticated” way of
playing. It quickly rose to fame in the United States and was unofficially
reputed as our national past time.
Another reason that sports became
so highly integrated into Americans’ lives was the rise of boxing and the invention
of basketball and football. Boxing before the nineteenth century was largely
despised because of the violence and gambling that came along with it. However,
after the Marquess of Queensberry Rules called to have the boxers wear gloves
when they fought the sport rose to national fame almost immediately. With the
invention of football and basketball everyone in America had a sport of their
choosing to watch and love. Football first began in 1869, while basketball was
created later on in 1887. These two sports – although new – were vastly popular
in America. People flocked to the games to watch how they were played and to
see the athletes who played them. This new fascination led to the sports being
incorporated into the collegiate level.
Speaking of collegiate sports –
they first began in 1852 with the first rowing match between Harvard and Yale.
This was followed by the first baseball game in 1859 between Williams and
Amherst, and later followed by the first football game in 1869 between
Princeton and Rutgers. Harvard University is actually where the football that
Americans play today was created. Beforehand football was more like soccer – a kicking
sport. However, Harvard wanted it to be closer related to that of rugby and
thus the IFA (Intercollegiate Football Association) adopted the rules to fit
Harvard’s version.
It was also during the nineteenth century
where Vaudeville shows came to be as the main form of mass entertainment. The
first Vaudeville Theater began in 1881 in Manhattan by Tony Pastor. New York
was pretty much the Vaudeville capital of the United States soon after as they
had ten theaters there (New York is still the capital of theater with Broadway
taking over). For the younger generations, “the greatest show on Earth” was
invented by Phineas Barnum and James Bailey. It was a three-ring circus with a
vast array of acts for the kids – and it is still very popular in today’s
society.
The nineteenth century was also
dubbed the “age of the bicycle.” The invention of the velocipede – the bike
with the really big wheel – was in 1885. The bicycle than became safer with
equal sized tires and became a much better way of exercise for everyone. It
also helped improve women’s fashion as they were unable to ride with the
Victorian hoop dresses, so designers had to come up with a freer and less
constrictive style.
Thursday, October 2, 2014
"The Luck or Roaring Camp"
I really loved the story “The Luck of Roaring Camp” by Bret
Harte. I’ve always been a fan of Western
literature. Growing up my favorite movie
was Tombstone. I loved all of the wild
action, the lack of law and order, the abundance of gunfights. I could watch Tombstone every day of the week
without it ever getting old. When I was
reading “The Luck of Roaring Camp” I noticed all of the similarities between
how that town, Roaring Camp, and the town of Tombstone are represented. Roaring Camp is dirty, rugged, full of criminals
all running from the law, very much like Tombstone. Tombstone is run by a gang, the law in that
town is virtually nonexistent due to the fear that the gang, the Cowboys,
enforces. As I read the story and it
explained gamblers and drinkers and people shooting their revolvers just like a
lot of the scenes in Tombstone. One thing
that I thought this story did well was show how humanity can restart. While Roaring Camp is a dirty and rough place
everything changes as soon as a baby is brought into the mix. As soon as the baby is born, and the mother
dies, all of those men who were originally depicted as mean and gruff become
more human, more motherly. I think it is
almost comical how clean and caring the men become. Each one of them does his part to care for
the baby, Tommy Luck, the “luck” of Roaring Camp. It’s funny how when the baby is born another
character, Kentuck, calls him a “damned little cuss” but he uses it is as an
endearment. It is clear that all of the
men in the town love the baby and it helps them to better themselves. I think that this story does a great job of
showing that anyone can change if they find something worth caring for. For these men, before the baby, there was
nothing to care for. They were simply
trying to get by, avoid the law, make a little money, and have a good
time. They gambled, they fought, they
drank to their fill whenever they pleased.
They were noisy, they were messy and they were just downright
gross. Once they find something worth
truly caring for, the baby which is attributed to their newfound luck, they
really turn over a new leaf. They begin
to refurbish the broken furniture within the camp. They start to bathe regularly if they intend
to spend time with the baby, they are quiet and they are more civilized. The end of the story is tragic which I think
only attests to the fact that in an instant everything can change in an
instant. As soon as the flood comes it
changes the landscape and the well-being of the camp. Many people die, including the baby and
Kentuck and the men who survive are left to rebuild for themselves and
restart. Their lives change again in an
instant just as quick as they did when little Tommy Luck was born and the camp
decided that keeping him would be the right thing to do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)